Search Results (9090 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-39620 2 Priyanshumittal, Wordpress 2 Appointment, Wordpress 2026-04-08 N/A
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in priyanshumittal Appointment appointment allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Appointment: from n/a through <= 3.5.5.
CVE-2026-3499 2 Jkohlbach, Wordpress 2 Product Feed Pro For Woocommerce By Adtribes – Product Feeds For Woocommerce, Wordpress 2026-04-08 8.8 High
The Product Feed PRO for WooCommerce by AdTribes – Product Feeds for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 13.4.6 through 13.5.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_migrate_to_custom_post_type, ajax_adt_clear_custom_attributes_product_meta_keys, ajax_update_file_url_to_lower_case, ajax_use_legacy_filters_and_rules, and ajax_fix_duplicate_feed functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger feed migration, clear custom-attribute transient caches, rewrite feed file URLs to lowercase, toggle legacy filter and rule settings, and delete duplicated feed posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-39640 2 Mndpsingh287, Wordpress 2 Theme Editor, Wordpress 2026-04-08 N/A
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mndpsingh287 Theme Editor theme-editor allows Code Injection.This issue affects Theme Editor: from n/a through <= 3.2.
CVE-2026-39632 2 Themegoods, Wordpress 2 Grand Blog, Wordpress 2026-04-08 N/A
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Blog grandblog allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Blog: from n/a through <= 3.1.
CVE-2026-4401 2 Wordpress, Wpchill 2 Wordpress, Download Monitor 2026-04-08 5.4 Medium
The Download Monitor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the `actions_handler()` and `bulk_actions_handler()` methods in `class-dlm-downloads-path.php` in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.10. This is due to missing nonce verification on these functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete, disable, or enable approved download paths via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-1673 2 Realmag777, Wordpress 2 Bear – Bulk Editor And Products Manager Professional For Woocommerce By Pluginus.net, Wordpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the woobe_delete_tax_term() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete WooCommerce taxonomy terms (categories, tags, etc.) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or shop manager into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-1672 2 Realmag777, Wordpress 2 Bear – Bulk Editor And Products Manager Professional For Woocommerce By Pluginus.net, Wordpress 2026-04-08 6.5 Medium
The BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the woobe_redraw_table_row() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update WooCommerce product data including prices, descriptions, and other product fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or shop manager into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-39710 2 Stmcan, Wordpress 2 Rt-theme 18 | Extensions, Wordpress 2026-04-08 5.4 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in stmcan RT-Theme 18 | Extensions rt18-extensions allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RT-Theme 18 | Extensions: from n/a through <= 2.5.
CVE-2026-33373 2 Synacor, Zimbra 2 Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Collaboration Suite 2026-04-08 8.8 High
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Web Client due to the issuance of authentication tokens without CSRF protection during certain account state transitions. Specifically, tokens generated after operations such as enabling two-factor authentication or changing a password may lack CSRF enforcement. While such a token is active, authenticated SOAP requests that trigger token generation or state changes can be performed without CSRF validation. An attacker could exploit this by inducing a victim to submit crafted requests, potentially allowing sensitive account actions such as disabling two-factor authentication. The issue is mitigated by ensuring CSRF protection is consistently enforced for all issued authentication tokens.
CVE-2026-34896 2 Analytify, Wordpress 2 Under Construction, Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode, Wordpress 2026-04-08 7.5 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Analytify Under Construction, Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Under Construction, Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode: from n/a through 2.1.1.
CVE-2026-34904 2 Analytify, Wordpress 2 Simple Social Media Share Buttons, Wordpress 2026-04-08 7.5 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Analytify Simple Social Media Share Buttons allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Social Media Share Buttons: from n/a through 6.2.0.
CVE-2025-9889 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The ContentMX Content Publisher plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cmx_activate_connection function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bind their own ContentMX connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-8669 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The Customify theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 0.4.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reset_customize_section function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset theme customization settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-7841 2 Sertifier, Wordpress 2 Certificates-open-badges Plugin, Wordpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The Sertifier Certificate & Badge Maker for WordPress – Tutor LMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sertifier_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's api key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-5930 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-2935 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-08 5.4 Medium
The Anti-Spam: Spam Protection | Block Spam Users, Comments, Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2024.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the 'ss_option_maint.php' and 'ss_user_filter_list' files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete pending comments, and re-enable a previously blocked user via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-1320 1 Mtrv 1 Teachpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The teachPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 9.0.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the import.php page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imports via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-14846 2 Socialchampio, Wordpress 2 Socialchamp With Wordpress, Wordpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The SocialChamp with WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the wpsc_settings_tab_menu function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-13205 2 Devsoftbaltic, Wordpress 2 Surveyjs Drag Drop Wordpress Form Builder, Wordpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The SurveyJS: Drag & Drop WordPress Form Builder to create, style and embed multiple forms of any complexity plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the `SurveyJS_CloneSurvey` AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate surveys via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-13194 2 Devsoftbaltic, Wordpress 2 Surveyjs Drag Drop Wordpress Form Builder, Wordpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The SurveyJS: Drag & Drop WordPress Form Builder to create, style and embed multiple forms of any complexity plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing nonce verification on the 'SurveyJS_RenameSurvey' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to rename surveys via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.