| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in servlet/traveler in IBM Lotus Notes Traveler before 8.5.3.3 Interim Fix 1, when Firefox is used, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the redirectURL parameter, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4824 and CVE-2012-4825. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in servlet/traveler in IBM Lotus Notes Traveler through 8.5.3.3 Interim Fix 1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that create problem reports via a getReportProblem upload action. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Login page in IBM Lotus Web Content Management (WCM) 6.0.1.4, 6.0.1.5, and 6.0.1.6 before iFix 32; and 6.1.0.1 and 6.1.0.2 before iFix 24; for WebSphere Portal allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Lotus Domino 7 and 8.5 FP1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon exit) and possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string in a crafted LDAP message to a TCP port, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3087. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in login.jsp in IBM WebSphere Portal, IBM Lotus Web Content Management (WCM), and IBM Lotus Workplace Web Content Management 5.1.0.0 through 5.1.0.5, 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.0.4, 6.0.1.0 through 6.0.1.7, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.3, and 6.1.5.0; and IBM Lotus Quickr services 8.0, 8.0.0.2, 8.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.1.1 for WebSphere Portal; allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the query string. |
| Open redirect vulnerability in login.jsp in IBM WebSphere Portal, IBM Lotus Web Content Management (WCM), and IBM Lotus Workplace Web Content Management 5.1.0.0 through 5.1.0.5, 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.0.4, 6.0.1.0 through 6.0.1.7, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.3, and 6.1.5.0; and IBM Lotus Quickr services 8.0, 8.0.0.2, 8.1, 8.1.1, and 8.1.1.1 for WebSphere Portal; allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via the query string. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the UltraLite functionality in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.281 for Domino 8.0.2 FP4 have unknown impact and attack vectors. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the Lotus Domino Web Access ActiveX control in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) 6.5, 7.0 before 7.0.4, 8.0, 8.0.2, and before 229.281 for Domino 8.0.2 FP4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long URL argument to an unspecified method, aka PRAD7JTNHJ. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.281 for Domino 8.0.2 FP4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to lack of "XSS/CSRF Get Filter and Referer Check fixes." |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.281 for Domino 8.0.2 FP4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors related to lack of "XSS/CSRF Get Filter and Referer Check fixes." |
| IBM Lotus Notes 7.0, 8.0, and 8.5 stores administrative credentials in cleartext in SURunAs.exe, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by examining this file, aka SPR JSTN837SEG. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM Lotus Notes 8.5 and 8.5fp1, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown attack vectors, as demonstrated by the vd_ln module in VulnDisco 9.0. NOTE: as of 20100222, this disclosure has no actionable information. However, because the VulnDisco author is a reliable researcher, the issue is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Connections 2.5.x before 2.5.0.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) create or (2) edit form in the Communities component, the (3) verbiage field in the Bookmarks component, or (4) unspecified vectors related to the Mobile Blogs component. |
| The bookmarklet pop-up in the Bookmarks component in IBM Lotus Connections 2.5.x before 2.5.0.2 does not properly follow the "force SSL" setting, which might make it easier for remote attackers to obtain the cleartext of network communication by sniffing the network, or spoof arbitrary servers via a man-in-the-middle attack. |
| The Top Updates implementation in the Homepage component in IBM Lotus Connections 2.5.x before 2.5.0.2, when "forced SSL" is enabled, uses http for links, which has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors. |
| Open redirect vulnerability in the Mobile component in IBM Lotus Connections 2.5.x before 2.5.0.2 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors, related to "mobile edit actions," aka SPR ASRE83PPVH. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the webcontainer implementation in IBM Lotus Sametime Connect 8.5.1 before CF1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka SPRs LXUU87S57H and LXUU87S93W. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the MailCheck821Address function in nnotes.dll in the nrouter.exe service in the server in IBM Lotus Domino 8.0.x before 8.0.2 FP5 and 8.5.x before 8.5.1 FP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long e-mail address in an ORGANIZER:mailto header in an iCalendar calendar-invitation e-mail message, aka SPR NRBY7ZPJ9V. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in stcenter.nsf in the server in IBM Lotus Sametime allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the authReasonCode parameter in an OpenDatabase action. |
| The Connection Manager in IBM Lotus Mobile Connect (LMC) before 6.1.4, when HTTP Access Services (HTTP-AS) is enabled, does not delete LTPA tokens in response to use of the iNotes Logoff button, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain access via an unattended client, related to a cookie domain mismatch. |
