| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Photography grandphotography allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Photography: from n/a through <= 5.7.8. |
| Hereta ETH-IMC408M firmware version 1.0.15 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify device configuration by exploiting missing CSRF protections in setup.cgi. Attackers can host malicious pages that submit forged requests using automatically-included HTTP Basic Authentication credentials to add RADIUS accounts, alter network settings, or trigger diagnostics. |
| The Aruba HiSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.4. This is due to missing nonce verification on the `ahsc_ajax_reset_options()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset all plugin settings to their default values via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CMSsite 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into visiting crafted pages that submit POST requests to the users.php endpoint with parameters like source=add_user, source=edit_user, or del=1 to create, modify, or delete admin accounts. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in priyanshumittal Bluestreet bluestreet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bluestreet: from n/a through <= 1.7.3. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in priyanshumittal Busiprof busiprof allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Busiprof: from n/a through <= 2.5.2. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in spicethemes SpicePress spicepress allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects SpicePress: from n/a through <= 2.3.2.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Car Rental grandcarrental allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Car Rental: from n/a through <= 3.6.9. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Magazine grandmagazine allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Magazine: from n/a through <= 3.5.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Skywarrior Blackfyre blackfyre allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Blackfyre: from n/a through <= 2.5.4. |
| Inappropriate implementation in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Phpbb phbb3 v.3.3.15 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the login function and the authentication mechanism |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Phpbb phbb3 v.3.3.15 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Admin Control Panel icon management functionality. |
| Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.0.1 and 6.5.4, the OAuth callback endpoints for Microsoft, Google, and Facebook external credentials do not validate a CSRF state parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.1 and 6.5.4. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Portfolio grandportfolio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Portfolio: from n/a through <= 3.3. |
| The Advanced Contact form 7 DB plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'vsz_cf7_save_setting_callback' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete form entry via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| RedwoodSDK is a server-first React framework. From 1.0.0-beta.50 to 1.0.5, erver functions exported from "use server" files could be invoked via GET requests, bypassing their intended HTTP method. In cookie-authenticated applications, this allowed cross-site GET navigations to trigger state-changing functions, because browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies on top-level GET requests. This affected all server functions -- both serverAction() handlers and bare exported functions in "use server" files. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.6. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in priyanshumittal Appointment appointment allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Appointment: from n/a through <= 3.5.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Blog grandblog allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Blog: from n/a through <= 3.1. |
| The Product Feed PRO for WooCommerce by AdTribes – Product Feeds for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 13.4.6 through 13.5.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_migrate_to_custom_post_type, ajax_adt_clear_custom_attributes_product_meta_keys, ajax_update_file_url_to_lower_case, ajax_use_legacy_filters_and_rules, and ajax_fix_duplicate_feed functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger feed migration, clear custom-attribute transient caches, rewrite feed file URLs to lowercase, toggle legacy filter and rule settings, and delete duplicated feed posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
